Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahendra K. Tandon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1997No. 95-3148Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

111 F.3d 482

79 A.F.T.R.2d 97-2292, 97-1 USTC P 50,373

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Mahendra K. TANDON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-3148.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Sept. 30, 1996.

Decided April 18, 1997.

Dan Aaron Polster, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, Robert E. Lindsay (briefed), Alan Hechtkopf, Karen M. Quesnel (argued), Yoel Tobin, U.S. Department of Justice, Appellate Section Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Phillip J. Korey (argued and briefed) Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BOGGS…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Boggs; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API