Legal Opinion

Ronald K. Cosby v. Burlington Northern Inc. And Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1986No. 85-2400PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Ronald L. Cosby and 138 other terminated employees of the Frisco Transportation Company, a subsidiary of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (Frisco), petition this court to enforce an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). We dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction.

This action began when ICC approved a merger of Burlington Northern with Frisco. The ICC’s final approval of that merger provided for employee protective conditions under New York Dock Railway-Control-Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979), aff'd sub nom. New York Dock Railway v. United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Ronald L. Cosby v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goos v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. Nebraska State Legislative Board v. Rodney SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Nebraska State Legislative Board v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Todd Goos v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API