Legal Opinion

United States v. Heavrin

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided February 25, 2004No. Criminal Action 3:99CR-113-HPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEYBURN, Chief Judge.

For the third time the Court considers substantial aspects of this case. The original Memorandum of Acquittal in U.S. v. Heavrin, 144 F.Supp.2d 769 (W.D.Ky.2001), discussed the evidence in the criminal trial. Later, the Court awarded attorney’s fees under the Hyde Amendment. U.S. v. Heavrin, 187 F.Supp.2d 738 (W.D.Ky.2001). Now on remand from the Sixth Circuit, this Court must determine whether Heavrin is entitled to those attorney’s fees under the circuit’s newly articulated standard. See United States v. Heavrin, 330 F.3d 723 (6th Cir.2003).

I

The Sixth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Donald HeavrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. HeavrinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
  4. United States v. HeavrinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API