Rhode v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Kurt Louis Rhode, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate and remand for consideration of Rhode’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
I
Rhode, who pled guilty to and is serving a 60-month sentence for child enticement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), filed the present pro se § 2255 motion to vacate based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. In a memorandum attached to his motion, Rhode explained that,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Richard Joseph Lynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- John D. Dupree v. Warden, Attorney General, State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- McKay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Edward Dell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Long v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Denzil Earl McKathan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.