Grinnell v. Bebb
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Ira L. Grinnell and Clayton A. Grinnell, copartners as Grinnell Bros., against John E. Bebb, for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs are dealers in musical instruments. In March, 1896, they delivered a piano to the defendant, and took from him a writing signed by him, acknowledging the possession of the piano, which he *158thereby agreed to purchase on conditions mentioned, as follows, viz.: To pay therefor $425, in installments stated, at times specified (or sooner, at his option); the piano to remain the property of plaintiffs and subject to their order until fully paid for. It contained a clause providing that in case of failure to pay, or in case of removal, etc., the right to possession should, at the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Banks v. Gay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Shepard v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Rogers v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Lee v. . KnappSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Parker Gatling v. . W. O. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- American Central Corp. v. Stevens Van Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. FurkasMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Ackron Contracting Co. v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Haller v. WalczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1956