Legal Opinion
Arbisser v. Gelbelman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a mortgage foreclosure action, the defendant Esther Gelbelman a/k/a Esther Fuchs a/k/a Esther Bazion appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated April 3, 1996, as denied that branch of her motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her pursuant to Laws of 1992 (ch 216, § 27 [b]) and deemed the summons with proof of service timely filed nunc pro tunc.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the branch of the motion is granted, and the complaint is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winston v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Barsalow v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mohammed v. ElassalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Long v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Srsich v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mandel v. Waltco Truck Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kelly v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kitch v. MarkhamNew York Supreme Court · 1997