Legal Opinion

Leahy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 12, 1906No. 10550 CongressionalPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peelle, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendants move to dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction, on the ground that the bill referred by the resolution of the United States Senate under section 14 of the act of March 3, 1887, is not a bill providing “ for the payment of a claim against the United States, legal or equitable,” and in support of their motion they rety on the case of Bellah (39 C. Cls. R., 396).

In that case the bill referred was one authorizing and directing the Secretary of War to cause to be investigated by the Quartermaster’s Department of the United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bellah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cahalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1907
  2. Missouri v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API