Legal Opinion

Metzger v. Guynup

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The motion will have to be denied. The suit did not abate by the death of the plaintiff David Weaver: Or. L., § 38; nor by the transfer of the property involved pending the trial of this suit: Meyers v. Hot Lake Sanatorium Co., 82 Or. 587, 589 et seq. (161 Pac. 697).

Said Anna Gibbs had a right to have the suit prosecuted to final termination in the name of the plaintiff. Having taken the property while the suit was pending she would be bound by the decree. Again, only the Gresham property was conveyed to Anna Gibbs. Block 15 in said Des Moines Addition to Portland remained the property either…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parrish v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Archer v. LappOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Templeton v. HollinsheadOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Meyers v. Hot Lake Sanatorium Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phegley & Cavender v. Swender Blue Print Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kane v. KaneOregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API