Legal Opinion
Reed v. Schultz
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 20, 1999No. 49A02-9807-CV-598PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUCKER, Judge.
When Indiana Superintendent of Public Instruction Suellen Reed summarily removed Dr. Geoffrey F. Schultz from his position as a Special Education Hearing Officer, he filed suit asserting entitlement to a pre-termi-nation due process hearing. The trial court agreed and granted partial summary judgment in Dr. Schultz’s favor. In so doing, the trial court remanded the matter to the Superintendent for a determination of just cause. The Superintendent now appeals contending the trial court erred because (1) Dr. Schultz had no property right protected by the due process clause…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charnas v. Estate of LoizosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Indianapolis v. ByrnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Austin v. Vanderburgh County Sheriff Merit CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Turner v. City of KokomoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dr. Javier Abrego v. School City of East Chicago, an Indiana Public School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025