Legal Opinion
City of Sulphur v. Farmers' Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 18, 1924No. 14867PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON,- J.
This action was commenced by the defendant in error, Farmers’ National Bank of Oklahoma City, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover upon certain warrants of the defendant city amounting with interest thereon to $6,175.07.
The city of Sulphur filed its answer, in which it alleged that the entire indebtedness, with interest, had been duly paid, and that the warrants had been surrendered to the city of Sulphur and duly canceled by it.
The agreed facts and testimony show that the plaintiff, the owner of said warrants, sent them to the Bank of Commerce of Sulphur for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bank of Commerce v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. New State Bank of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Harryman v. BowlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Baker-Evans Grain Co. v. RicordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- First Nat. Bank of Stratford v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.