Legal Opinion

In re Chester A. Poling, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 26, 1943No. 16381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This is a motion in admiralty to permit the Cities Service Oil Company, hereinafter called Cities Service, to file a contingent claim either nunc pro tunc or otherwise in a limitation proceeding.

The limitation proceeding was occasioned by a fire involving a vessel owned by the petitioner and-the dock of the Cities Service.

The usual restraining order was entered in the proceeding on October 17, 1941, and thereby the time to file claims expired December 10, 1941. Hence this application of Cities Service to now file a contingent claim is made over a year and one-half after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Blue Stack Towing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Heier v. Panama Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API