Legal Opinion

Sandusky v. Brooklyn Box Toe Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 5, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This is a patent suit. The plaintiffs Morris M. and Joseph Sandusky are residents of the state of New York, and claim to be joint inventors of certain new and useful improvements in shoe shanks, for which on February 9, 1921, they duly filed an application for letters patent, and received on July 19, 1921, letters patent No. 1,384,858. The plaintiffs Shavenell and Josephson are trustees of letters patent of the so-called Winchell patent, United States No. 1,447,001, dated February 27, 1923, also involved in this decision. The plaintiff the Sandow Tool Company, Inc., is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. David v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  3. Hunt Bros. Fruit Packing Co. v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
  4. General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nguon v. GlynnDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  2. Shevenell v. Geo. J. Kelly, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API