Legal Opinion

People v. Acuna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal by the People, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated October 13, 1987, as after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his videotaped statements.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, and that branch of the motion which was to suppress the defendant’s videotaped statements is denied.

The hearing testimony consists solely of Sergeant Pepe’s testimony. We accord much weight to the hearing court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. LeungNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. YazumNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. AlexandreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. SirnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. VanegasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. ZadorozhnyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API