Legal Opinion
Santiago v. 1370 Broadway Associates, LP
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 2001PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, in accordance with this memorandum, and as so modified, affirmed. The certified question should be answered in the negative.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the alleged misfeasance of insurance agents and brokers toward their clients is not “malpractice” within CPLR 214 (6) (see, Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20 [decided today]). That a breach of contract claim against insurance agents and brokers would be governed by the six-year statute (CPLR 213 [2]) does not,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chase Scientific Research, Inc. v. Nia Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kwan v. SchleinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United Teamster Fund v. MagnaCare Administrative Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Ruffing v. Union Carbide Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.