Criswell v. Criswell
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentStiger, J.
(dissenting) — I. The first question for determination is whether the trial court erred in refusing to approve the referee’s report of sale to Carl Criswell for $5,800 because of the upset bid of $25 made by Ralph Criswell. The sale to appellant as the highest bidder at the public sale was subject to approval and confirmation by the court. Sections 12344 and 12345, 1939 Code.
It is well established that in sales in partition suits or other chancery sales the sale is not final and complete until confirmed and ratified by the court and in passing on the sale the court must exercise its sound…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. TriplettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Whitely v. WhitelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Everett v. ForstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Criswell v. CriswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Kiebel v. LeickIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Criswell v. CriswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941