Legal Opinion

Farley v. O'Brien

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1915Published

Motions for the direction of a verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.

At the close of the evidence each party moved for the direction of a verdict, and the case was left with the court for decision. I find that all the material allegations of the complaint in paragraphs 1 to 11 inclusive are established. The complaint alleges that the bond was conditioned that 0 ’Brien would not violate any of the provisions of the Liquor Tax Law. I recall no proof that O’Brien ever posted his certificate, or attempted to traffic in liquors upon the premises, and there is no proof that the par*91ticular condition of the bond recited in the complaint was violated. But the complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farley v. . SchernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. People Ex Rel. Hope v. . MastermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. People ex rel. Belden Club v. HilliardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Leonard v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Brown v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API