Wargovich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
This case, in our opinion, comes within the principles laid down by the. Supreme Court in Prudential Ins. Co. v. Kudoba, 323 Pa. 30, 186 A. 793, and Evans v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co., 322 Pa. 547, 186 A. 133, and the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury must be affirmed.
The facts may be stated as follows: On or before March 20, 1927, John Babyak applied to the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for two policies of life insurance, one for $232, to be issued without medical examination, premiums payable weekly, and one for $800, to be issued after a medical…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. KudobaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Indovina v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurdellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Ortega v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Greyer v. WaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Albert v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Pachter v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.