Legal Opinion

Wargovich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1939No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This case, in our opinion, comes within the principles laid down by the. Supreme Court in Prudential Ins. Co. v. Kudoba, 323 Pa. 30, 186 A. 793, and Evans v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co., 322 Pa. 547, 186 A. 133, and the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury must be affirmed.

The facts may be stated as follows: On or before March 20, 1927, John Babyak applied to the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for two policies of life insurance, one for $232, to be issued without medical examination, premiums payable weekly, and one for $800, to be issued after a medical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. KudobaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Indovina v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurdellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Ortega v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Greyer v. WaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Albert v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Pachter v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API