Hoyne v. Ling

This case is similar in all questions but one to Hoyne v. Danisch, (ante, p. 467,) this being an information filed against John Ling, as police magistrate of Wilmette, and the other being against Frank P. Danisch, as clerk of the municipal court of Chicago. In this case the State’s attorney has appealed and appellee has filed cross-errors, while in the other case the position of the parties was reversed in that regard.

Appellee, under cross-errors, has raised a question as to the constitutionality of the State’s Attorney Salary act not raised in’ the other case. He argues that the title of the…