Legal Opinion

De Silvio v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1982No. 78 Civ. 3875 (CHT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Frank De Silvio, a longshoreman, brought this action charging that he was injured as a result of defendant Prudential Lines, Inc.’s (Prudential’s) negligence while he was working aboard Prudential’s ship, the S.S. Santa Barbara. Defendant now moves to dismiss the action, claiming that De Silvio’s suit should be barred under the doctrine of laches. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of Prudential. 2

Background

De Silvio alleges that he was injured on November 24, 1974, aboard the S.S. Santa Barbara, when he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Monte v. Shipping Corp. of India, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. Lagares v. Good Commander Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grant Airmass Corp. v. Gaymar Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Cuisinarts, Inc. v. John Boos & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API