Legal Opinion

Serodino, Inc. v. Woods

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

In this case appellant seeks recovery of Tennessee sales and use taxes paid under protest. The Chancellor dismissed the suit, holding that the transactions out of which it arose were taxable. We affirm that decision.

The taxpayer is a Tennessee corporation engaged in business activities in and near the navigable waterways of this and other states. Its principal offices are in Chattanooga, but it maintains extensive facilities for dry-docking, repair and launching of river barges and other vessels at a shipyard on the Tennessee River at Hale’s Bar, near Guild,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Central Transportation Company v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Service Merchandise Co. v. TidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Airwork Service Division v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  2. South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. LeTourneau Sales & Service, Inc. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Board of Publication of the Methodist Church, Inc. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API