Legal Opinion
State v. Poulos
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 25, 1982No. 8977-3-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This appeal from a judgment of convictions of second degree rape and two counts of second degree robbery raises issues concerning the right to a speedy trial under CrR 3.3, as amended November 17, 1978, and the Sixth Amendment and pretrial photographic identification procedures. We affirm.
Issues
Issue One. Did the trial court err in denying Poulos' motion to dismiss for violation of CrR 3.3 or his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment?
Issue Two. Did the trial court err in denying Poulos' motion to suppress pretrial identification testimony under State v. Thorkelson, 25 Wn. App.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HattoriCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984