Legal Opinion

Kean v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Worth District Court.* — Hon. C. P. Smith and C. II. Kelly, Judges. On rehearing. Suit in equity to recover rent alleged to be due under a written lease. There was a judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant W. A. Hofmaster, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The lease sued on was executed by the plaintiff and the defendant Rogers in August, 1903, for a term of seven years from the 1st day of September, 1903. The building was used' by Rogers for a drug store until he sold his drug stock and transferred the lease *561to the defendant Hofmaster in the early part of November of the same year. Hofmaster conducted a drug business therein until soon after Christmas, 1905, when he sold his stock and fixtures to one Speedling, who remained in the building a week or ten days and then removed the stock therefrom. Hofmaster had paid the rent up to January 1,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amory v. KannoffskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Schuisler & Donnell v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Terstegge v. First German Mutual Benevolent SocietyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Armour Packing Co. v. Des Moines Pork Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. of Patchin v. DickermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eggers v. PaustianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Ryke v. ReamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Ballenger v. KahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Van Dyk v. MosterdtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Conner v. JordinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API