Legal Opinion
Milich v. Schenley Industries, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order is affirmed on the memorandum *953at the Appellate Division. In addition, we note that the issue of bad faith on the part of the defendant, whatever its merits might have been in the abstract, was neither pleaded nor proved (cf. Gillmore v Procter & Gamble Co., 417 F2d 615; Endres v Buffalo Auto. Assn., 25 Misc 2d 756; Ritz v News Syndicate Co., 16 Misc 2d 1013; Prize Contests—Rights and Remedies, Ann., 87 ALR2d 649, 673).
Chief Judge Breitel and Cooke, J. (dissenting). We dissent and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Theodore R.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Probate of the Will of NewinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- Ritz v. News Syndicate Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daley v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Truong v. AT&TAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Fish v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Didley v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Milich v. Schenley Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.