Legal Opinion

Egbert v. Hanson

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

.Action for contribution.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiffs, the defendant Hanson’s testator and the remaining defendant Smith, together with one Cameron, for the purpose of loaning their credit to the White Cloud Copper Mining Company, of which each of the persons referred to was a director, indorsed each of three notes, amounting in the aggregate to $10,000, for the accommodation of said company, which thereafter negotiated the notes for value. The corporation and the defendant Smith were insolvent when the obligations matured and are now insolvent, and the indebtedness was paid by the plaintiffs who seek contribution in this action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easterly v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Bradley v. BurwellNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Hagerthy v. PhillipsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  4. Pfluger v. WilshusenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re McCORDDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
  2. Bernstein v. LiebowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Municipal Bank v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API