Bucurescu v. 190A Realty Corp. (In Re Bucurescu)
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
The Bankruptcy Judge, confronted with difficult, inarticulate and unschooled pro se litigants who in all probability have no legitimate grievance, imposed sanctions upon them and, upon their failure to pay, dismissed the matter without further notice or opportunity to be heard. While a good deal of frustration with appellants is entirely understandable, the question whether the actions below may stand is substantial.
Facts
This notice of appeal, filed March 5, 2002, describes the “Court Order” appealed from as that “based on The Affidavit of Non…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Becker v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilk Auslander LLP v. Murray (In re Murray)District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Becker v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re: Sears Holdings CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- In re: John F. Campbell v. Radiance Capital Receivables Twelve LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026