Legal Opinion

Dunham v. City and Borough of Juneau

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 13, 1990No. A-3034PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Clark Dunham was convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI), in violation of City and Borough of Juneau Code section 72.10.-010, and was sentenced by District Court Judge Linn A. Asper as a first DWI offender. The City of Juneau subsequently moved to correct the sentence, contending that it was illegal because Dunham was in fact a second DWI offender. Magistrate Richard N. Siangco granted the city’s motion and resentenced Dunham as a second DWI offender. Dunham appeals, contending that the increase in his original sentence was barred by double jeopardy. We affirm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shagloak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. LaPorteCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  3. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  2. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  3. State v. Baize, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  4. Christensen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API