Jackson v. Darcy
New Jersey Court of Chancery
The question in this case arose on a motion made on the part of the defendant, after answer filed, to dissolve an injunction obtained by the complainant, on filing his bill, to restrain Darcy, one of the defendants, from farther prosecuting certain suits against the complainant and others, before a justice of the peace. The facts, as disclosed on the hearing, appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
It is represented in this case that Gould, being debtor to Jackson to the amount of one hundred and sixty dollars, confessed a fraudulent judgment to Peter A. Ryer-son for one hundred dollars, before Abram Ryerson, esquire, the brother of the said Peter. That there was no consideration for the judgment,, no state of demand filed, and no affidavit made, according to the requirements of the law. That execution was issued at the request of Gould, the defendant, for the purpose of protecting his property ; and that while suits were pending on the claim of the complainant, the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- D'Amore v. D'AmoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982