Legal Opinion

Hullender v. Berryhill

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided September 16, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00261Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 3:18-cv-00261-MOC-WCM DAVID A. HULLENDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vs. ) ORDER ) ANDREW SAUL,1 ) Commissioner of Social Security ) ) Defendant. ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Memorandum and Recommendation (#16) of the magistrate judge. In the Memorandum and Recommendation, the magistrate judge advised the parties of the right to file objections within 14 days, all in accordance with

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(c). Plaintiff timely filed Objections (#17), the Commissioner timely filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional CorporalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. Sizemore v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  5. Patricia A. Mitchell v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API