Patrick A. McKenna v. Floyd A. Wallis and Pan American Petroleum Corporation, Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Floyd A. Wallis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentWisdom, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent.
I do not say that the Court’s decision is likely to start dangerous temblors in American federalism. It has always been in the cards that federal common law would expand as the activities of the national government expanded.1 For many years, before Erie, the federal “judge followed his own nose”; he “sat down and looked up what relevant federal law there might be in the cases and otherwise decided what the law ought to be * * * though in some few instances the judge might consider relevant state decisions”.2 Moreover, I agree with Judge Henry Friendly’s summary of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.