Legal Opinion

Barstow v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided April 18, 1961No. Claim No. 38431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSidney Squire, J.

Claimants move “ for summary judgment pursuant to Civil Practice Rule 113 on the second cause of action in this claim, [sic] and for an order of the Court directing an immediate hearing* before a referee to assess the amount or the extent of the damages to which claimants are entitled ’ ’. The motion is vigorously opposed by the defendant, orally and by brief and affidavit.

Claimants sued the defendant on alternate causes of action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 258) arising out of alleged breach of contract for the performance of professional engineering services (survey and detail design, Nassau…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API