Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. True

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 1900Published

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Charlotte Y. Ackerman against Clarence F. True. From a judgment for plaintiff (66 N. Y. Supp. 140), defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

This action was brought to obtain a judgment declaring six dwelling houses erected by the defendant upon the east side of Riverside Drive, between Eighty-Second and Eighty-Third streets, in the city of New York, to be unlawful obstructions to the public highway, and an unlawful interference with, plaintiff’s easements of light, air, and access, and for a mandatory injunction against maintaining the same, with damages. Briefly stated, the material facts are as follows: The plaintiff is the owner of a lot situated on the northeast corner of Riverside Drive and Eighty-Sec- and street. She also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Cogswell v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Stowers v. . GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Libmann v. Manhattan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API