Legal Opinion

Putnam v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1920No. 11394Published

Indictment for forgery; from Ben Hill superior court — Judge Gower. February 14, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. One is not guilty of uttering a forged paper unless lie knows that it is a forgery. Stephens v. State, 56 Ga. 605; Raper v. State, 16 Ga. App. 121 (84 S. E. 560).

2. Where one is being tried under an indictment containing two counts, in one of which ho is charged with the forgery of a certain bank check, and in the other with the offense of knowingly uttering and publishing the cheek as true, it is error to instruct the jury, in effect, that the defendant would be guilty of uttering and publishing the alleged forged check if he attempted to pass it, and if by reasonable inquiry he could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meador v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Raper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API