Legal Opinion

Newcrete Products v. City of Wilkes-Barre

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 2012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this appeal, we are asked whether the doctrines of piercing the corporate veil and equitable subrogation are available avenues of relief where a municipality allegedly influences its redevelopment authority to perpetrate inequity against a vendor. Specifically, Newcrete Products (New-crete) appeals an order of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) that sustained the City of Wilkes-Barre’s (City) preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. Newcrete contends the equitable doctrines, which typically apply to private business corporations, are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. NolandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Com. of PA Acting by AG Kathleen Kane v. Golden Gate National Senior Care LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. McDaniel ex rel. E.E. v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Bradley v. Zoning Hearing Board of New MilfordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Swan ex rel. I.O. v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  5. Brodsky, W. v. MJC Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API