Legal Opinion
City of Austin v. Chandler
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 18, 2014No. 03-12-00057-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT K. FIELD, Justice.
To address the issues raised in appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration, we withdraw our opinion and judgment dated February 7, 2014, and substitute the following in their place.
The Appellees — a group of public safety officers over the age of 40 who worked for appellant the City of Austin’s now defunct Public Safety Emergency Management Department (PSEM) — sued the City for age-based employment discrimination. The Appellees asserted that the City’s method of consolidating the PSEM into the Austin Police Department (APD) dis-paratear impacted older PSEM…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jefferson County v. AkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Aaron v. Bishop Ronald J. Booker Richard Burns Albert Cortez, Jr. Eric De Los Santos Jovita Lopez Aurelio Martinez Norris McKenzie Tomas Montez Henry D. Moreno Ricardo Pelayo Jesse Prado Oscar Ramirez James Stanesic Lester Vanzura v. the City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2018
- Barnes v. 7-Eleven IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- C. O. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
- Craig Miller and Treasa Miller v. Superior Forestry Service, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.