Legal Opinion

Carr v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1878PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Lafayette Circuit Court. — Hon. William T. Wood, Judge as to vendor’s lien, Adams v. Cowherd, 30 Mo. 458; MeClurg v. Phil~ Ups, 57 Mo. 214 and 49 Mo. 315; Tatum v. Brooker, 51 Mo. 148; Harrington v. Fortner, 58 Mo. 468; Major, Admr., v. Bukley, 51 Mo. 227; Johnston v. Gwathmey,4 Litt. 318; Davis v. Clay, 2 Mo. s. p. 161; Linton v. Boly, 12 Mo. 567; Digman v. McCollam, 47 Mo. 372; Rhodes v. Outcalt, 48 Mo. 367; Fmison v. Whittlesey, 55'Mo. 254; Mackrith v. Symmons,…

Read the full summary

Error to Lafayette Circuit Court. — Hon. William T. Wood, Judge as to vendor’s lien, Adams v. Cowherd, 30 Mo. 458; MeClurg v. Phil~ Ups, 57 Mo. 214 and 49 Mo. 315; Tatum v. Brooker, 51 Mo. 148; Harrington v. Fortner, 58 Mo. 468; Major, Admr., v. Bukley, 51 Mo. 227; Johnston v. Gwathmey,4 Litt. 318; Davis v. Clay, 2 Mo. s. p. 161; Linton v. Boly, 12 Mo. 567; Digman v. McCollam, 47 Mo. 372; Rhodes v. Outcalt, 48 Mo. 367; Fmison v. Whittlesey, 55'Mo. 254; Mackrith v. Symmons, 15 Yes. 329; Leading Oases in Equity, Yol. 1, Hare & Wallace’s Notes, top pages 270,272, 274; Davis v. Lamb, 30 Mo. 441;…

1Opinion of the CourtHough, J.

— This was a proceeding to enforce a vendor’s lien against certaiu lands in Lafayette county.' The defendant, Liese, denied the existence of the lien, and *474pleaded tlie statute of limitations The court below entered a decree in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff has brought the case here by writ of error. The existence of the lien depends upon the construction to be given to an instrument, executed by the plaintiff, and others, which was intended to be a conveyance, but which, for the want of a seal, could not take -effect as a deed. Notwithstanding some errors of syntax, it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durette v. BriggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Adams v. BuchananSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  4. Sullivan v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n v. LoomisIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Conservative Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WarneckeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Ball v. Peper Cotton Press Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Jackson v. Paulsel Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Howe v. MittelbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API