Legal Opinion

Daigle v. McLaughlin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 26, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 188-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

Cross-motions for summary judgment and defendants’ alternative motion to dismiss the complaint raise a single issue left open in a recent opinion of the Court of Appeals 1: Whether the District of Columbia Policemen and Firemen’s Retirement and Disability Act2 gives to a fireman otherwise eligible, the absolute right to elect retirement while his status is that of a “suspended” (but not discharged) employee.

The undisputed material facts are these: Since October 1,1956, § 4-528(1) of the latest revision of the Retirement and Disability Act has provided that:

“Any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hardy v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Samuel Spencer v. Albert I. BullockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. People ex rel. Hardy v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Bullock v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. ComesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Masse v. Board of TrusteesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. ComesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. ComesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API