Legal Opinion · Dissent

BD. OF TRUSTEES POLICE & FIREMEN RET. SYS. v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1985No. Docket 67445Published

1DissentR. M. Maher, J.

I respectfully dissent. I do not agree with the majority that the language of 1982 PA 55, as contained in MCL 38.1133; MSA 3.981(113), clearly and unambiguously endows an investment fiduciary with the independent authority to retain private legal counsel and to pay for that counsel with the income of the investment system even where a provision of a city charter requires the investment fiduciary to follow other procedures to obtain counsel. The statute is not clear and unambiguous in its discussion of an investment fiduciary’s authority to hire legal counsel. While such counsel is arguably…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scannell v. Michigan Public School Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API