Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 18, 2008No. 4360PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

Hoss Hicks appeals the circuit court’s decision to grant the State’s motion to reconsider his sentence, specifically asserting that good cause was not shown to require him to register as a sex offender. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Hicks was indicted for criminal sexual conduct with a minor (Victim). At trial, Hicks pled guilty to the lesser offense of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature(ABHAN), although he admitted to having had sex with the fourteen-year-old Victim. During sentencing, both parties were invited to make statements to the court, and defense counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re M.B.H.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. In Re MBHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API