Legal Opinion
Noble v. Ritterbush
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1987No. CA-7815PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GULOTTA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss defendant’s appeal on the grounds that defendant failed to timely appeal from a judgment of preliminary injunction within the 15 day period provided for in LSA-C.C.P. Art. 3612.1
In this dispute between two attorneys involving possession of clients’ files, the trial judge, on March 9, 1987, rendered “Judgment For Plaintiff On Rule For Preliminary Injunction”, ordering defendant to “return the case files in his possession and obtained by him at the Noble Law Firm, Ltd”, to the plaintiff law firm. A motion and order of appeal was granted on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Schwegmann Bros. GS Mkts. v. Louisiana Milk Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Cuccia v. BozemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Riverside Citrus Farm, Inc. v. Louisiana Citrus Lands, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gurvich v. New Orleans Private Patrol Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Noble v. RitterbushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Noble v. RitterbushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988