Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ballard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1920No. 5694PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Ellis County. Original Habeas Corpus proceedings, asking release from a conviction for failing to make a report of school funds to the Superintendent of Public Instruction; penalty, five hundred dollars and thirty days in county jail. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Relator was convicted in the County Court of Ellis County, and seeks relief here, by writ of habeas corpus, from what he claims to be a void judgment. It is plain that such must appear to be the character of the judgment before we would entertain an attack upon it "by such a writ.

The charge in the trial court was by complaint and information, the charging part of which is as follows:

“That one J. A. Ramsey and one B. F. Ballard, and each of them, did on or about the 1st day of October, 1918, and before the making and filing of this information, in the County of Ellis, State of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ex parte McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. In re FarrellMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Abbott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Ex Parte JarvisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Ex parte MinorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Ex Parte EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API