Rauscher v. Cronk
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from Oneida county court. Action brought in justice’s court by Christian J. Eauscher against William Cronk, as trustee of school-district No. 7, towns of Ara and Western, and after a trial there before a jury the verdict was, no cause of action. Thereupon the plaintiff appealed to the county court, and a trial was had, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff of 25 cents.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Oneida county court. Action brought in justice’s court by Christian J. Eauscher against William Cronk, as trustee of school-district No. 7, towns of Ara and Western, and after a trial there before a jury the verdict was, no cause of action. Thereupon the plaintiff appealed to the county court, and a trial was had, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff of 25 cents. Motion for a new trial on the minutes was made and denied, and defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict in the county court, and from the order of that court denying a motion for a new trial.…
1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.
September 30, 1887, a school meeting was held in the district. At that meeting, “Mr. Cronk, the defendant, got up, and stated the object of the meeting. He said he had called them together to see about building a privy; to see what sort of one they would build, and where they should set it. They voted to build a new one. They then went out, and looked to see where they should put it. Then Mr. Doran came in, and made a motion to put an addition of three feet on the old one; saying how it should be built. ” A resolution was offered and passed declarative of the location, size, and character of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Isaacs v. Terry & Tench Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908