Legal Opinion

Voisine v. Berube

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 29, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] This appeal arises from a shareholder’s derivative action pursuant to 13-C M.R.S. §§ 751-758 (2010) filed by Gary Voisine on behalf of Valley Firewood and Tree Farm, Inc. (“Valley”) against Valley and Robert J. Berube, a shareholder and president of Valley. Berube appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Cuddy, J.) following a jury-waived trial, finding that Be-rube breached his duty to act in good faith toward Valley, pursuant to repealed 13-A M.R.S.A. § 716 (1981 & Supp.1999),1 and awarding damages to Valley in the amount of $1,500,000, with half of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gentile v. RossetteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Harry Lewis v. Earle A. Chiles, Howard Burnett, Virgil Campbell, Earl M. Chiles, Cyril K. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Quinn v. Anvil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vitorino America v. Sunspray Condominium AssociationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API