Broussard v. Stine
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
This is a suit for breach of contract. Plaintiff Broussard alleges that he incurred losses as the result of Mr. Stine’s breach of a contract to provide adequate water for the irrigation of plaintiff’s rice crop on approximately 400 acres of land. The jury found for the plaintiff and awarded him $16,599.00 in damages. Defendant appeals.
The substantial issues on appeal are: (1) Was there a contract between Mr. Brous-sard and Mr. Stine? (2) Was the contract breached? (3) What damages did plaintiff suffer as a result of the breach?
In his brief, counsel for appellant gives only…
2Cited by2 opinions
- LeJeune v. J. W. Cappel TrustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Broussard v. StineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978