Legal Opinion

Broussard v. Stine

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1978No. 6566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a suit for breach of contract. Plaintiff Broussard alleges that he incurred losses as the result of Mr. Stine’s breach of a contract to provide adequate water for the irrigation of plaintiff’s rice crop on approximately 400 acres of land. The jury found for the plaintiff and awarded him $16,599.00 in damages. Defendant appeals.

The substantial issues on appeal are: (1) Was there a contract between Mr. Brous-sard and Mr. Stine? (2) Was the contract breached? (3) What damages did plaintiff suffer as a result of the breach?

In his brief, counsel for appellant gives only…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. LeJeune v. J. W. Cappel TrustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Broussard v. StineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API