Legal Opinion
United States v. 2035 Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided November 30, 2017No. 5:14-cv-05075Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5:14-CV-05075-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION vs. TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT AND DENYING OTHER MOTIONS 2035 INC., a corporation, and ROBERT L. LYTLE, an individual d/b/a 2035 PMA and QLASERS PMA, Defendants. Defendant Robert L. Lytle moves the court to alter or amend its judgment entered on May 4, 2017. Dockets 194 and 194-1.1 Lytle has also filed several other motions that primarily seek to challenge the court’s personal and subject-matter jurisdiction. Dockets 197, 200, 201, 205, and 206.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Thomas Chisolm BartshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Gander Mountain Co. v. Cabela's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- James Wong v. Bann-Cor MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.