Legal Opinion

State v. Apollonio.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2013No. SCWC-11-0000695PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that because the charge of Excessive Speeding, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-105(a)(l) (Supp.2010), against Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Ricardo Apollonio (Petitioner) did not allege that Petitioner acted intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly it failed to allege the requisite state of mind. State v. Nesmith, 127 Hawai'i 48, 56, 276 P.3d 617, 625 (2012). Therefore, for the reasons stated herein, we vacate the August 22, 2012 judgment of the ICA, which affirmed the August 23, 2011 Notice of Entry of Judgment and/or Order and Plea/Judgment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ElliottHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. Willard S. Carlock, Sr., Mitchell J. Scimemi, Willard S. Carlock, Jr., and Columbus J. LairdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. Basham.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. MaharajHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Adams v. CDM Media USA, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Davis.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API