Legal Opinion
People v. Doe
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*412OPINION OF THE COURT
George J. Balbach, J.
Petitioner moves to quash or modify a subpoena.
The petitioner in this action is counsel for a nursing home. He was served with a subpoena dated January 24, 1979, which was issued by the office of the Special Prosecutor on behalf of a Queens Grand Jury investigating nursing home abuses. Thereafter, petitioner appeared before the Grand Jury and testified but refused to answer some 24 questions on the grounds that the information which he might supply would violate the attorney-client relationship.
At issue here is petitioner’s unusual contention that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Will of PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rosseau v. . BleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- People v. BelgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- The People v. . WentzNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Megan-Racine Associates, Inc. (In Re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- People v. Fentress, New York County Courts1980
- People v. HairstonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982