Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Rosol
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided September 30, 1941No. File 60643PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
The collision upon which the action is based is'alleged to have occurred March 28, 1940. The plaintiff sues upon a complaint dated March 10, 1941. The writ was served on the defendant March 27, 1941, and the case was returnable to the first Tuesday of May, 1941. On August 13, 1941, the defendant filed an answer and counterclaim. The plaintiff demurs to the counterclaim because it sets up a tort action and was not brought within one year.
In the recent case of Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. vs. M. & M. Transp. Co., 128 Conn. 107, it was held that notice to opposing counsel of an intention to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Tuohey v. MartinjakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- New Britain Lumber Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Gorham v. BurkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seletsky v. RoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
- Seletsky v. RoyPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1961