Legal Opinion
Gentry v. Schweiker
District Court, D. Montana
Decided May 13, 1981No. CV-80-91-GFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Scott Gentry appeals from the Secretary’s decision denying his claim for disability benefits. In order to qualify for benefits, Gentry was required to establish that on or before February 10, 1977, the date he met the earnings requirement, he was totally disabled as provided under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423. This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
The issue for review is whether the Secretary’s finding that Gentry was not entitled to disability benefits is based on substantial evidence. Hall v. Secretary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alexandria S. Day v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Andrew C. Mark v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Mack Hall, Sr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- William D. Cox v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hilliard v. SchweikerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1983
- McKeral v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986
- Talifson v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1982