Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grays Harbor County v. Motorship Brimanger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1933No. 23662. En BancPublished

1DissentMitchell, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. The question of responsibility for the damages occasioned in the towing of a ship, as between the vessel towing and the one towed, is often one of difficulty. Not necessarily because of conflict in the law on the subject, but rather a misunderstanding of, or failure to observe, the controlling facts as distinguished from conclusions of fact in each individual case.

In Hughes on Admiralty (2d Ed.), 125, the author says:

‘ ‘ The relation between tug and tow, under the American decisions, under ordinary circumstances, is that of independent contractor, not that of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Blacken v. Everett Bottling WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. The C. W. MillsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1915
  4. The Mary WittichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API