Legal Opinion

VandenBerg v. VandenBerg

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2002No. Docket No. 229998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before this Court following our reversal and remand in VandenBerg v VandenBerg, 231 Mich App 497, 503; 586 NW2d 570 (1998) (VandenBerg I). Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants under MCR 2.116(C)(7) on the ground that plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

*660Plaintiff argues that the trial court improperly dismissed her malpractice claim because (1) the doctrines of res judicata and law of the case prevented the trial court from considering a statute of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ashker v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. VandenBerg v. VandenBergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Scarsella v. PollakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Vandenberg v. VandenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Apsey v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Candi Ottgen v. Abdalmaijid Katranji MdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Desmond Washington v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API